Tuesday, January 9, 2018

James Franco, cheap pervert

Don't know what the movie's about but it's called The Long Home.


In Rick Schmidt's old book, Feature Filmmaking at Used Car Prices, he called for filmmakers to pay actors a $100-a-day per diem in addition to deferred pay. That was in the '80's and he noted back then that it was less than minimum wage. He considered it very little to be paying an actor. It would be about $200 a day in today's money.

So why was millionaire James Franco paying actors only $100 a day to be in whatever movie he was making? And any woman who wanted a speaking part had to do a nude scene. Why didn't he do his own nude scenes? You don't think that would boost DVD sales?

Traditionally, by the way, in photography, you pay a model at least double for posing nude. Franco was too cheap to pay $200 for days they shot nude scenes?

That grinning Zionist parasite is paying only slightly better than the kids I see on Craigslist making zero-budget zombie movies on video.

No comments:

Post a Comment