So I read some reviews of Young & Beautiful.
Reminded me of what I read one time many years ago, long before the avalanche of internet pornography. They discussed how subjective the term "pornography" was. Researchers discovered that people were more likely to label a photograph "pornographic" if it was in black and white rather than color, and if the model in the photo was less attractive.
In the case of Young & Beautiful, critics see the fact that there was no explanation at all for the girl becoming a prostitute as a virtue and the nudity and explicitness of the sex scenes as a peculiarity of the French which only the most sophisticated Americans will understand. The fact that all the director does is make movies about teenage sex apparently makes him an auteur rather than a pervert. The little brother spying on his sister through binoculars, peeking in her room and watching her masturbate, and wanting her to tell him all about losing her virginity to a German tourist is seen as wholesome curiosity.
There's a scene where the girl, wanting to show how hypocritical the grown-ups are for not letting her be a prostitute, asks her stepfather if he's ever slept with a prostitute.
Instead of replying, "Good lord, no! Are you kidding?" he says, "That's none of your business!"
The rich people in the movie were all attractive. The maid and the cops were less attractive.
The movie should be a lesson in how to make the upper-class rubes think that your cheap exploitation movie is high brow cinema.
Monday, September 15, 2014
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment