Linda Ford writing on Feminism being co-opted on Counterpunch.com:
She begins:
I am a retired history professor and historian of women, a socialist,
and a radical feminist. I know what feminism is, and I know it’s being
co-opted. What is feminism? How is it defined? Feminism is the belief
in equality for women. But feminism is being used now for unrelated,
or even opposite causes, like war, transgender bathrooms, anti-Russia
hysteria and political opportunism.
And, on the subject of Wonder Woman:
In a way, Wonder Woman also represents the contradictions of radical,
egalitarian feminism. Her creator, William Moulton Marston, wanted to
show female superiority, and so placed her origins in all-female Amazon
society. I’ve—as a feminist—always loved the idea of Amazon society,
whether as historical reality (there
is evidence) or Greek and
Roman myth. In both cases, Amazon society is a women-run matriarchy,
led by strong, capable women warriors, warriors who did go to war for
more than self-defense, although they apparently were always up against
stronger armies. Marston’s superior Amazon society was also, although
featuring women warriors, a peace-loving society.
Hence Wonder Woman
was tasked to bring her superpowers to the service of a peaceful world:
she would save the world from violence and evil. She was also a
female superhero, personifying Anthony and Paul’s feminism whose “ideal is strength,” as did the Amazons of history and myth.
So now we have Gal Gadot’s Wonder Woman, the movie, and again,
feminism is co-opted, this time in the service of what Glen Ford of
black agenda report calls the War Party. The
New York Times’
review of “Wonder Woman” said the movie highlights Wonder Woman’s
“sacred duty to bring peace to the world,” although admitting it took a
lot of killing to do it. There is, therefore, this Orwellian “war is
peace” aspect to the film. The Wonder Woman I knew and loved was never
this bloodthirsty, seeming to revel in the violence and the fight. She
was always the strong character—female superhero!—she did not, as
goddess and superhero, have an equal and/or romantic relationship with
Captain Steve Trevor, always portrayed as weak and in need of rescue. I
also had a problem with the actress Gal Gadot as Wonder Woman, a woman,
in real life, very much in the service of Israeli aggressive military
might, even when that might was turned against the children of Gaza in
2014. Wonder Woman here, as Jonathan Cook recently wrote in an
excellent piece on Mondoweiss, is disguised as someone practicing
“humanitarian intervention,” à la neo-liberal imperialists like Hillary
Clinton. Wonder Woman, in this movie, is promoting aggressive western
military domination. Amazonian feminism, women warriors ruling their
own world, or a superhero woman saving the world
without bringing more violence to it, is co-opted.