 |
| Mia Farrow with "close friend" and child rapist Roman Polanski and fellow adoptive mother Joan Crawford. |
Woody Allen has another movie coming out, so, of course, Dylan Farrow has attacked him demanding to know why Louis C.K. is being shunned (at least for the moment) and Woody Allen isn't.
Maybe it's because there was a single accusation against Allen 25 years ago that was reported to police the day after it allegedly happened and because it was thoroughly investigated by law enforcement and dismissed. The New York Department of Social Services investigated for 14 months and dismissed it saying there was "no credible evidence". Because Mia Farrow had pretty obvious reason to make a false accusation. Because there were witnesses present, including Dylan's brother, Moses, who say it didn't happen and couldn't have happened. There was a massive amount of reporting on it that went on for years. No one ignored the accusation. They read about it and didn't buy it.
The Farrow clan claims that the only reason Allen wasn't prosecuted was that it would have been too traumatic for Dylan, but then they never shut up about it. They never let her forget it. Mia Farrow's book about it was made into a TV movie. They didn't think THAT might be upsetting to Dylan?
I don't like Woody Allen. I wish they'd stop making me defend him.
No comments:
Post a Comment