Sunday, February 12, 2023

Russian movie industry breaks records

A story on RT, the Russian news service, on the state of the Russian movie industry. 

Sanctions and western boycotts have the same effect as protective tariffs for Russian industry.  Things are picking up for their movie industry since Hollywood and the EU pulled out of the country, but they don't say how movie theaters are faring.

The article discuses other countries competing with Hollywood or coping with being cut off from American movies.

Iran is becoming prominent in international film festivals, China and South Korea are competing with Hollywood and doing pretty well. I don't know about China, but in Korea's case, the average movie-goer is ten years older than the average American ticket buyer, so their culture hasn't been ravaged by the sort of superhero crap that's taken over here. France is the one of the few countries where Hollywood controls less than 50% of the market.

From the article:

2022 was the first year when Russian-made movies accounted for over half of all box office receipts with a total share of 52.1%. In comparison, at this time last year 73.36% of the content shown here was foreign. January 2023 became the best month ever for Russian cinema and box office earnings topped 8,663 billion rubles ($118 million). This was a 61.8% increase from 2022 and improved on the 2020 record by 12.3%.

This success was largely due to the release of the family blockbuster “Cheburashka”, which set a record at the national box office and collected 6 billion rubles (almost twice as much as “Avatar” in 2009) or $80 million.

Currently, there are several movies in post-production that may not break the record but will likely be successful. For example, “The Challenge” is set to be released in cinemas this April. This is the first feature film to be partially shot in space on the ISS.

The absence of Hollywood is already balanced by the development of domestic drama. By the end of 2022, the number of Russian films and TV series that went into production increased by 16%.

This growth has been prompted by the withdrawal of Hollywood blockbusters, which accounted for a major share of box office receipts. If Hollywood does decide to return, it will probably face much fiercer competition than before.

They note that the EU is more dependent on the Russian market and that France's Pathe has announced they'll return to Russia.

The article goes into the reason for Hollywoods global dominance:

Hollywood is a unique industry. Its modern movies are specifically tailored to international audiences. Their goal is to encompass the widest possible number of viewers.

There are a variety of reasons and viewpoints on why Hollywood dominates the global film market. Among other factors, this is linked to a greater urban population in the US, as opposed to other countries. In the US, the domestic market proved to be so large that movies made returns at home and were then exported abroad to compete with local film industries. Such a strategy eliminates risks, since, even in case of failure, the production can't suffer a significant financial loss. Moreover, the growth of the US economy in the post-WWII era contributed to the strengthening of the film industry, especially against the background of the economic damage inflicted on Europe.

However, even Hollywood hasn’t been able to take over all markets. It is much less popular in countries with protectionist laws in place, such as France. The share of American movies is also smaller in regions with significant cultural differences like India, China, and Africa.

Read the whole thing here:

Hollywood abandoned Russia one year ago, but the country's box office has just set an all time record: How did this happen? — RT World News

Friday, February 10, 2023

Woody Allen's Coup de Chance done already

Have I lost track of time? Seems like only yesterday they announced this, Woody Allen's latest and possibly last film, shot mostly in Paris in French, what the French call a policer, a crime movie a la Match Point.

Maybe they'll have a dubbed version. The French watch his movies dubbed into French. Why shouldn't we see this dubbed in English?


Why actors shouldn't get giant tattoos

Or maybe they should.

I read somewhere that a large majority of people, when they try out a new pen, will write their names. 

Which I assume is why so many people get their own names tattooed on them. Like they have no idea at all except they want a tattoo. Maybe they want to make sure their bodies can be identified in a timely manner. That would be a more likely scenario than ever needing to conceal your identity. How many seasons would The Fugitive have lasted if his name had been tattooed on him?

In fairness, such a tattoo probably has a deeper meaning and is more practical than any of the other crap people get indelibly etched on their bodies. Like if you lose your identification and need to cash a check. It might save you from being locked up in a case of mistaken identity.

I just saw a picture of a former child actor with a huge tattoo of his name across his chest. If it had been his first name, it might have been less of an impediment to his career. Jackie Chan has played countless characters named Jackie but none named Chan. 

It could be his way of ending an acting career he never chose, or of making sure he doesn't have to take his shirt off in anything. 

It could be a face-saving measure to explain away a failed career.

"I can't act anymore. I have this tattoo."

Wednesday, February 8, 2023

Butch Patrick on Adam-12

My brother's in town. He's watching Adam-12, the one where Reed and Malloy are working with kids for some reason. A girl tells them that one kid has a gun. A REAL gun.

The kid had dark hair, but I thought for some reason that it might be Jodie Foster's brother, Buddy. He appeared in episodes of both Adam-12 and Dragnet. I googled it and found it was Butch Patrick from The Munsters.

"That's Eddie Munster," I told my brother.

"It is?"

"I think so," I said to make it sound like I hadn't just looked it up.

I didn't recognize Butch Patrick at all.

Saturday, February 4, 2023

I should learn more about Harry & Meghan

I don't know what I'm supposed to think about "Prince" Harry and his consort, Meghan. I quoted an article from a supposedly left-wing website that sided with Charles and William. If the article had a working class angle, I don't know what it was.

I was at my sister's house and briefly discussed Netflix. I said I had cancelled it because every time I looked at it, there was absolutely nothing I wanted to see and if there was, I could watch it somewhere else. But I said I briefly wished I had it so I could see that Prince Harry thing on there. I got over it quickly, but, for a couple of minutes, I thought I might like to see it, not out of sympathy for anyone but just to see what people were talking about, if their disdain for one snotty British royal or another was justified. 

My sister and her husband seemed angry. What did I want to watch THAT for? Like I was some kind of idiot.

I don't know what they didn't like about them. I had to explain why people called Prince William "Pugsly"----that he had bad genes. He had seemed like perfectly nice boy but it was just a matter of time before he became just like the rest of his Addams Family-like kin. And I pointed out that Harry enjoyed murdering people in Afghanistan because he said it was like playing a video game.  

I could have watched Harry and Meghan interviewed by Oprah or on 60 Minutes for free and I opted out. I think I should get some credit for that. 

Friday, February 3, 2023

Some normal people discuss E.T.


I listened to some perfectly pleasant, sincere film writers discuss E.T. on an old podcast. They  talked about their admiration for Steven Spielberg and debated whether he was the greatest filmmaker ever. They weren't sure how Elliot being a child of divorce played a role in his relationship with the space monkey. At least one of them thought it was a "perfect" movie, but I don't know how they figured that. Ironically, they kept saying "f--k". I don't like Spielberg at all and I never use obscene language.

I must have been 21 when E.T. came out. It was a children's movie and didn't interest me, but it was the first movie where I recognized a character as a Christ figure. It was some years before I started seeing Oedipal conflicts everywhere.

So am I the bad guy for not liking this thing? One of the guys now watches it with his children and has to hurry away to cry in the bathroom at the end. I don't remember having much reaction to the ending.

Ed Reardon's Week (BBCRadio4)


Ed Reardon's Week
is a BBC radio sit-com about a failed writer. He sees himself as a serious author but published only one novel in the 1970's, wrote a single script for a 1980's TV series and has been reduced to hack work and abject poverty ever since. 

Is there a message? That a hack writer is still a far better writer than the rest of us? To not let early success make you to cling to a career you should really give up on? I read some Gambler's Anonymous literature for some reason. Compulsive gamblers generally start out winning, but that makes them think that if they keep doing it long enough, they'll start winning again.

I downloaded what episodes I could and have been binge-listening. 

It still amazes me that the British still have radio shows but I guess it shouldn't be so surprising.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ed_Reardon%27s_Week